INFORSE-Europe logo

Search on the site:
 
Facebook INFORSE Facebook INFORSE-Europe CAUSE: 100% RE INFORSE Twitter
EnglishSpanish French Hungarian Slovak Polish German
 
About Us Contact Us Member Database Contact Database Support Us
PortugueseRomanian Turkish Bulgarian Macedonian Russian Danish
ACTIVITIES
  100% Renewables
Seminars & Events
  Projects
  LCS Network
PUBLICATIONS
  Press Releases
  Newsletter
  Reports
POLICY
United Nations
European Union
  Nuclear Energy
  Gender
  Structural Funds
EDUCATION

 

School Resources
  DIERET
  Study tours 
  Success Stories 
  Test yourself Quiz
  Useful Links
VISIT INFORSE.ORG
Estonia 100% Renewable Energy

Estonian Sustainable Energy Vision

Sustainable Energy Vision Estonia pdf 65 kBNovember 2011:
The Estonian Sustainable Energy Vision is similar to the vision for EU; but developed to fit the situation in Estonia.

The proposed development follows in general the same path as in the European vision, but given the large biomass and wind potentials, and the desire to reduce fossil fuel imports, the vision has a strong focus on actions to turn the current trend into reductions of fossil fuel use, also before 2020. This includes gradually replacing oil shale with biomass in the coming two decades. The scenario includes some growth in energy services for household, service and transport sectors, with all growth in transport in rail transport. The scenario includes a transition of the energy supply and demand with phase-out of fossil energy over a 25-30 year period, 2010 - 2040.

If this vision is turned into reality it will have a number of positive effects for Estonia. With a transition to domestic, renewable energy sources, Estonian will no longer be hurt directly by the energy prices increases of fossil fuels that many expect will come as a result of the dwindling resources of fossil fuels. With realisation of the vision, Estonia would also be in the front in the reduction of climate change, a position that can be very valuable in the future. Further, the emphasis on local resources will also benefit the economy with increased employment and a more positive trade balance. If Estonia is going to continue its development and growth, it has to be energy efficient.

To show the positive effects in more details, an analysis is made of the economic effects of the proposed transition until 2030, compared with continued use of oil-shale and natural gas and compared with a scenario with nuclear power. See results below.

Increase in Energy Efficiency
In line with INFORSE’s global vision for sustainable energy, the Estonian Vision is based on increase of energy efficiency. A number of studies have shown that with best available technology, on the market or close to market introduction, it is possible to increase energy efficiency with a factor four or more for most energy uses. Most energy consuming equipments will be changed several times until 2040, and if new generations of equipment are made with optimal energy performance, and markets are made to promote the most efficient technology, it will not be a problem to reach today's best available technology. This will not happen by itself, given that the "natural" technological development in EU countries has been about 1% per year. The development of selected sectors is shown on the graph below.

The Challenge of Reducing Heat Consumption
For buildings the situation is different from equipment and vehicles because buildings often have lifetimes of 100 years or more. Many of the houses to be heated in 2050 are probably already built. Statistics indicates that efficiency of heating did improve some 2000 – 2008. The need for large replacement or major renovation of block houses build during the Soviet Union gives an opportunity for large increases in efficiency, if appropriate standards and support is in place. Efforts should be continued following EU regulation. This is expected to be a combination of improved heating installations in houses and improved buildings. During the scenario the heating efficiency is expected to be doubled, leading to a halving of the specific energy use for heating (heat demand per m2).

Efficient Transport
For transport is assumed that the conversion-efficiency from fuel to transport-work is doubled (except for aviation) with more efficient cars and with transition to electric traction in rail and road. This increase is expected to happen until 2040. Most of the changes are only expected after 2020. Some road transport will also be converted to biogas and liquid biofuels, but only based on production in Estonia.

Graph: Development of energy efficiency expressed in development of specific energy demand compared with 2000 for one supply sector (CHP) and 4 end.use sectors.

An underlining assumption for this development is a generally stable population in Estonia.

Transition to 100% renewable energy
The results of the proposals for increasing renewable energy use, increase in energy efficiency, and moderate growth of energy services lead to the transition to renewable energy in about 30 years. One way of the transition is expressed in the two graphs below:



The graphs show how the increased energy efficiency leads to reduced primary energy demands, but also to increased power consumption after 2020. when electric transport and heat pumps are introduced in the scenario.

The scenarios for transition to renewable energy of Estonia is described in details in this paper, March 2011 (pdf file, 900 kB)

Comparing Fossil, Nuclear, and Renewable Scenarios
To evaluate the above scenario, INFORSE-Europe has compared the 100% renewable energy scenario with continued use of fossil fuel (mainly oil-shale and natural gas) and with a scenario with a nuclear power plant in Estonia. The comparison is made for the situation in 2030, when still some fossil fuel is used in alls scenarios; but when the power structure have been rebuilt according to the three scenarios. The comparison is made with modeling the energy system in 2030 hour by hour with typical variations in consumption, wind power etc. The three scenarios have the same energy efficiency and energy service assumptions, so the comparison show only the effect of different energy supply systems. As the graph below shows, the renewable scenario is the cheapest. Of course the economic results depends on the assumptions, and if for instance an accident happen with nuclear power, this scenario will be much more expensive than in the present example.

Graph: Comparison of total costs in 2030 of three scenarios for Estonia. The costs include import and export of electricity, which is a cost for the fossil scenario (net import) and an income for the renewable and nuclear scenarios (net export). The CO2 costs are set to 18 €/ton.

Further explanations and comparisons, as well as the assumptions behind the modeling of the three scenarios are given in the this paper (pdf 180 kB), November 2011,

See also: Information in Estonian (13 pages, pdf file, 0.6 MB)

 

Estonian

The work on this paper and the sustainable energy vision for Estonia is partly paid by funding received from the Nordic Council of Ministers, and the European Commission; but it expresses the findings and the views of the authors and of INFORSE-Europe and not necessarily of the funders and the funders are not liable for use of the information.

Return to Vision2050                                     Return to INFORSE-Europe